Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla X2090 +132%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy