Home GPU Comparison Intel UHD Graphics P750 vs AMD FirePro A320

Intel UHD Graphics P750 vs AMD FirePro A320

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics P750 and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel UHD Graphics P750 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (15W vs 100W)
AMD FirePro A320 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (955MHz vs 900MHz)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
UHD Graphics P750
0.461 TFLOPS
FirePro A320 +59%
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
HD Graphics-W
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
955 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
256
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.640 GPixel/s
57.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.92 GTexel/s
921.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
460.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
733.4 GFLOPS
115.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

15W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Rocket Lake GT1
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A320
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm+++
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy