ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm vs AMD Atari VCS 400 GPU
We compared two Game console GPUs: 512MB VRAM Xbox 360 GPU 80nm and 4GB VRAM Atari VCS 400 GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm 's Advantages
48 additional rendering cores
AMD Atari VCS 400 GPU 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1201MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (38.40GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
Lower TDP (15W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Xbox 360 GPU 80nm
0.24 TFLOPS
Atari VCS 400 GPU
+92%
0.461 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2007
Release Date
Dec 2020
Console GPU
Generation
Console GPU
Game console
Type
Game console
-
-
-
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
240
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
12
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.804 GPixel/s
8.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.41 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
922.4 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
461.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
28.82 GFLOPS
Board Design
175W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Xenos Falcon
GPU Name
Banded Kestrel
Crayola 6
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.232 billion
Transistors
4.94 billion
156 mm²
Die Size
210 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.4
