Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs GRID A100A

Quadro K1200 vs GRID A100A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1124MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 400W)
GRID A100A Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
GRID A100A +1106%
13890
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
108
512
Shading Units
6912
32
TMUs
432
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA100
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy