Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 142W)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200 +136%
1151
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
486
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
512
Shading Units
256
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
142W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GF100
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy