Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro FX 3600M

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro FX 3600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200 +619%
1151
Quadro FX 3600M
160
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Feb 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
512
Shading Units
64
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G92
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy