Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 260W)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (1620MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +1197%
14930
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1230 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
512
Shading Units
4608
32
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
155.5 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
466.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.86 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.93 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
466.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
260W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
TU102
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy