Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro M6000 24 GB

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro M6000 24 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1124MHz vs 1114MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)
Quadro M6000 24 GB Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Quadro M6000 24 GB +494%
6844
Blender
Quadro K1200
88
Quadro M6000 24 GB +427%
464
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Mar 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
988 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

512
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
96
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
285.2 GTexel/s
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GM200
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
GM200-880-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy