Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9475F vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3945WX

AMD EPYC 9475F vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3945WX

We compared the server AMD EPYC 9475F with 48 cores 3.65GHz and the desktop AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3945WX with 12 cores 4.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9475F 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3200)
Larger memory bandwidth (576GB/s vs 204.8GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4.0)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 64MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 7nm)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3945WX 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (4.0GHz vs 3.65GHz)
Lower TDP (280W vs 400W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Jul 2020
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Turin
Core Architecture
Zen 2
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
sWRX8
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Generation
-

Package

66.52 billions
Transistor Count
-
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
400 W
Power Consumption
280 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
90 °C
TSMC
Foundry
-
8x70.6 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

48
Performance Cores
12
96
Performance Core Threads
24
3.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
4.0 GHz
4.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
48
Total Core Count
12
96
Total Thread Count
24
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
36.5
Multiplier
40x
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
6 TB
Max Memory Size
2048 GB
12
Max Memory Channels
8
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
204.8 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
4.0
128
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy