Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9645 vs Centaur CHA

AMD EPYC 9645 vs Centaur CHA

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9645 with 96 cores 2.3GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9645 's Advantages
Released 123 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.3GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 16nm)
Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 320W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Jan 1901
AMD
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
CHA
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
CHA (CNS)

Package

Transistor Count
-
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
320 W
Power Consumption
70 W
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
mm²
Die Size
195 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

96
Performance Cores
-
192
Performance Core Threads
-
2.3 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
96
Total Core Count
8
192
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
23.0
Multiplier
12.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
4
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
3
128
PCIe Lanes
44

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy