Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9645 vs Intel Xeon X5698

AMD EPYC 9645 vs Intel Xeon X5698

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9645 with 96 cores 2.3GHz and Intel Xeon X5698 with 2 cores 4.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9645 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 12MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 32nm)
Intel Xeon X5698 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (4.4GHz vs 2.3GHz)
Lower TDP (130W vs 320W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Feb 2011
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Westmere-EP
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 1366
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
Xeon (Westmere-EP)

Package

Transistor Count
1.17 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
32 nm
320 W
Power Consumption
130 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
mm²
Die Size
239 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

96
Performance Cores
-
192
Performance Core Threads
-
2.3 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
96
Total Core Count
2
192
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
133 MHz
23.0
Multiplier
33.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
12 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR3
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
3
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
2
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy