Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9825 vs Centaur CHA

AMD EPYC 9825 vs Centaur CHA

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9825 with 144 cores 2.2GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9825 's Advantages
Released 123 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.2GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 16nm)
Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 390W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Jan 1901
AMD
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
CHA
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
CHA (CNS)

Package

Transistor Count
-
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
390 W
Power Consumption
70 W
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
mm²
Die Size
195 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

144
Performance Cores
-
288
Performance Core Threads
-
2.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
144
Total Core Count
8
288
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
12.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
4
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
3
128
PCIe Lanes
44

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy