Home Comparison Centaur CHA vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3101

Centaur CHA vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3101

We compared two server CPUs: Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 with 4 cores 2.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 2666)
Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 8MB)
AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 's Advantages
Released 117 years and 1 months late
Higher base frequency (2.1GHz vs 1.2GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 16nm)
Lower TDP (35W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 5 Single Core
Centaur CHA
508
AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 +48%
755
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Centaur CHA +24%
3379
AMD EPYC Embedded 3101
2709
VS

General Parameters

Jan 1901
Release Date
Feb 2018
VIA
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
CHA
Core Architecture
Zen
VIA Socket 2084
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
CHA (CNS)
Generation
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))

Package

-
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
16 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
70 W
Power Consumption
35 W
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
195 mm²
Die Size
213 mm²

CPU Performance

1.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.9 GHz
8
Total Core Count
4
8
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
12.0
Multiplier
21.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
256 KB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
4
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
3
44
PCIe Lanes
32

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy