FirePro S7000 vs Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
2432
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+135%
5728
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Apr 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
36
1280
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
