GeForce GTX 1650 vs FirePro S7150 x2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 265W)
FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2984
FirePro S7150 x2
+10%
3297
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Feb 2016
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
265W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Tonga
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5