Home Comparison GeForce GTX 780 vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

GeForce GTX 780 vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 780 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 76% (1590MHz vs 902MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 +45%
4156
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2849
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

863 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
2304
Shading Units
896
192
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

43.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
173.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
4.156 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
173.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
80W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
TU116
GK110-300-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy