Home Comparison GeForce GTX 780 vs Radeon R9 360 OEM

GeForce GTX 780 vs Radeon R9 360 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 780 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1050MHz vs 902MHz)
Lower TDP (85W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 +157%
4156
Radeon R9 360 OEM
1613
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 700
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

863 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
2304
Shading Units
768
192
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

43.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
173.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
4.156 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
173.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
85W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
Tobago
GK110-300-A1
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy