Home Comparison Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654

Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U with 8 cores 1.8GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4000)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.8GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 22.5MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Jan 2023
Release Date
Mar 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Sapphire Rapids
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 4677
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Bronze (Sapphire Rapids-SP)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

-
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
125 W
Power Consumption
360 W
79 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

1.8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
1.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
8
Total Core Count
96
8
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
18.0
Multiplier
24.0
80 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
2 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
22.5 MB
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
1
AVX-512 FMA Ports
-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4000
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
8
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
5
80
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy