Intel Xeon W 2102 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon W 2102 with 4 cores 2.9GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 with 8 cores 1.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon W 2102 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (2666 vs 2133)
Higher base frequency (2.9GHz vs 1.5GHz)
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 8.25MB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon W 2102
+13%
894
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
789
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon W 2102
+36%
2849
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
2087
General Parameters
Aug 2017
Release Date
Feb 2018
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Skylake-W
Core Architecture
Zen
Intel Socket 2066
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Skylake-W)
Generation
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Package
-
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
120 W
Power Consumption
30 W
66 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
484 mm²
Die Size
213 mm²
CPU Performance
2.9 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
4
Total Core Count
8
4
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
29.0
Multiplier
15.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
8.25 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
1
AVX-512 FMA Ports
-
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR4-2133
4
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
3
48
PCIe Lanes
32
