Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon 680M
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 680M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)
Radeon 680M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 91% (2200MHz vs 1150MHz)
448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
736
Radeon 680M
+359%
3379
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
HD Graphics
Generation
Navi II IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
320
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
70.40 GPixel/s
46.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.758 TFLOPS
736.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.379 TFLOPS
184.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Haswell GT3e
GPU Name
Rembrandt
Generation 7.5
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
22 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
13.1 billion
Unknown
Die Size
208 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.0
Vulkan
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
