Home Comparison Opteron X2 165 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3101

Opteron X2 165 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3101

We compared two server CPUs: Opteron X2 165 with 2 cores 1.8GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 with 4 cores 2.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (2666 vs 400)
Higher base frequency (2.1GHz vs 1.8GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 90nm)
Lower TDP (35W vs 110W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Aug 2005
Release Date
Feb 2018
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Denmark
Core Architecture
Zen
AMD Socket 939
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Opteron X2 (Denmark)
Generation
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))

Package

0.233 billions
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
90 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
110 W
Power Consumption
35 W
65 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
-
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
199 mm²
Die Size
213 mm²

CPU Performance

1.8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.9 GHz
2
Total Core Count
4
2
Total Thread Count
4
200 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
9.0
Multiplier
21.0
128 KB per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
-
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR1-400
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
2
Max Memory Channels
2
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
PCIe Version
3
-
PCIe Lanes
32

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy