Quadro FX 1700 vs Tesla K40st
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40st to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 245W)
Tesla K40st 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2848 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
59
Tesla K40st
+5513%
3312
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Nov 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
2880
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
48
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
34.50 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.312 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1104 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
245W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GK110B
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
