Quadro FX 360M vs Quadro K2200M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 65W)
Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
Quadro K2200M
+3184%
854
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
640
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
65W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GM107
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
