Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro NVS 160M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
184 additional rendering cores
Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
+1908%
462
Quadro NVS 160M
23
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
1
192
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
24
ROPs
4
192 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
12W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
