Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro NVS 320M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
+524%
462
Quadro NVS 320M
74
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro FX
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
192 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
G84
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
