Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro P5200 Max Q

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro P5200 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1569MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Quadro P5200 Max Q +349%
8033
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
28
Quadro P5200 Max Q +350%
126
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1316 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
768
Shading Units
2560
48
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GP104
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy