Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Tesla T4

Quadro M2000 vs Tesla T4

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 16GB VRAM Tesla T4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Tesla T4 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (1590MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Tesla T4 +355%
8141
Blender
Quadro M2000
145
Tesla T4 +1039%
1652
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
28
Tesla T4 +453%
155
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Sep 2018
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
585 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
40
768
Shading Units
2560
48
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.8 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
254.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.13 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.141 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
254.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
TU104
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
TU104-895-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy