Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Tesla PG503 216

Quadro M2000 vs Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1530MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Tesla PG503 216 +777%
15670
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1312 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
768
Shading Units
5120
48
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GV100
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy