Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2224 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+7060%
5728
FirePro 2460 Multi View
80
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
1
2304
Shading Units
80
144
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
17W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
Cedar
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
