Home Comparison Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs Moore Threads MTT S4000

Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs Moore Threads MTT S4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5728
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +329%
24580

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
64
2304
Shading Units
8192
144
TMUs
512
32
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
450W
600 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
22 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net