Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs ATI FirePro V7900

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A16 PCIe +133%
4.339 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
May 2011
Tesla
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
1280
40
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.64 billion
Unknown
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy