Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs AMD FireStream 9270

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A16 PCIe +261%
4.339 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
800
40
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
160W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.956 billion
Unknown
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy