Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
14016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 760W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A +15863%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro K2100M
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jul 2013
Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
752 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
48.13GB/s

Render Config

228
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
14592
Shading Units
576
880
TMUs
48
0
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.004 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.02 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.4 GFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

760W
TDP
55W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
N15P-Q3-A1
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
146 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy