Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1750MHz vs 1440MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
PG506 242 +283%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Apr 2021
Alchemist
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
768
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
96
Tensor Cores
224
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
165W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GA100
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
7 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy