Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

Intel Arc A350 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 90% (2000MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (25W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350 +90%
3.072 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 360 OEM
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2015
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Tobago
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy