Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock1627MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +107%
13.82 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Embedded
6.664 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1192 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
7680
Shading Units
2048
240
TMUs
64
120
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
60W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
190 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy