Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 200.2GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Boost Clock1493MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +261%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro P2200
3.822 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jun 2019
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
5GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5X
4096bit
Memory Bus
160bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
200.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
10
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
1280
240
TMUs
80
120
ROPs
40
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.72 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
119.4 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
59.72 GFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.822 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
119.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy