Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

VS

Intel Arctic Sound 2T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 4 months late

Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)

3072 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile 's Advantages

Boost Clock1455MHz

More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Arctic Sound 2T +3%

13.82 TFLOPS

Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

13.41 TFLOPS

Arctic Sound 2T

VS

Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

Graphics Card

Jan 2021

Release Date

Sep 2019

Xe Graphics

Generation

Quadro Turing-M

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1275 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1455 MHz

1200 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

24GB

HBM2e

Memory Type

GDDR6

4096bit

Memory Bus

384bit

1229GB/s

Bandwidth

672.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

72

-

Compute Units

-

7680

Shading Units

4608

240

TMUs

288

120

ROPs

96

-

Tensor Cores

576

-

RT Cores

72

-

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

8 MB

L2 Cache

6 MB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

139.7 GPixel/s

216.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

419.0 GTexel/s

27.65 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

26.82 TFLOPS

13.82 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

13.41 TFLOPS

3.456 TFLOPS

FP64 (double)

419.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound

GPU Name

TU102

-

GPU Variant

-

Generation 12.5

Architecture

Turing

Intel

Foundry

TSMC

10 nm

Process Size

12 nm

8 billion

Transistors

18.6 billion

190 mm²

Die Size

754 mm²

Board Design

500W

TDP

Unknown

900 W

Suggested PSU

-

No outputs

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

N/A

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.5

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

2

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

3

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

4

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

5

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4

6

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID M60 8Q

7

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

8

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla D870

9

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID K520

10

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI100

Related News

1

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

2

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

3

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

4

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

5

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

6

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

7

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

8

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

9

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

10

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip