Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 500W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Mar 2007
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
-
240
TMUs
24
120
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.80 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G71
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Curie
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
90 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.278 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
45W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy