Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 6GB VRAM RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 132.0GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1140MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +136%
13.82 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
5.837 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Mar 2022
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
652 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1140 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
96bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
132.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
7680
Shading Units
2560
240
TMUs
80
120
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.48 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
91.20 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.837 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.837 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
91.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
60W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy