Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 640.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A4500 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (200W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 +71%
23.65 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Nov 2021
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
20GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
320bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
640.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
7168
240
TMUs
224
120
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
158.4 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
369.6 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.65 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
369.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
200W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy