CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A4500
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A4500
VS
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA RTX A4500
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 640.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A4500 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (200W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
RTX A4500
+71%
23.65 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
VS
RTX A4500
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Nov 2021
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
20GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
320bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
640.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
7168
240
TMUs
224
120
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
158.4 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
369.6 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.65 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
369.6 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
200W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
2
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
3
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
4
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
5
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
6
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID M60 8Q
7
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
8
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI100
9
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
10
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
Related News
1
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
2
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
3
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
4
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
5
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
6
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
7
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
8
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
9
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
10
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy