Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K40c 's Advantages
Boost Clock876MHz
Lower TDP (245W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +173%
13.82 TFLOPS
Tesla K40c
5.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Oct 2013
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
745 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
12GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
2880
240
TMUs
240
120
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK180
-
GPU Variant
GK180-890-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
245W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy