Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
7672 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +81194%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
8
240
TMUs
4
120
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.28 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
25W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy