CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
VS
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
7672 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
+81194%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
VS
Quadro FX 370 LP
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
8
240
TMUs
4
120
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.28 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
25W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
2
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
3
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
4
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
5
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
6
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
7
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
8
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID K140Q
9
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
10
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
Related News
1
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
2
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
3
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
4
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
5
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
6
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
7
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
8
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
9
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
10
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy