Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
8144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +12615%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2010
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
8192
Shading Units
48
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
35W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy