Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +78%
14.75 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
8192
Shading Units
2560
256
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
60W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
190 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy