CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+78%
14.75 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
RTX A2000 Embedded
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
8192
Shading Units
2560
256
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
60W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
190 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K420
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla T40 24 GB
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
Related News
1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy