Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro V520

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro V520

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1837MHz vs 1600MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
14592 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro V520 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +741%
62.08 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V520
7.373 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Dec 2020
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
132
SM Count
-
16896
Shading Units
2304
528
TMUs
144
24
ROPs
64
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
50 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.4 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.75 TFLOPS
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.373 TFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
460.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

1000W
TDP
225W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
Navi 12
-
GPU Variant
Navi 12
Blackwell
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
208 billion
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy