Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD FirePro V5900

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210 +1813%
11.75 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
May 2011
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
-
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
512
320
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
32
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Volta
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy