Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD FirePro W600

NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX +554%
5.027 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
512
88
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Cape Verde
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy