Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2264 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 185W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX +23659%
7.603 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Jan 2009
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
40
144
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

185W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
RV620
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy