CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA GRID K340
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA GRID K340
VS
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
NVIDIA GRID K340
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K340 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+2190%
16.79 TFLOPS
GRID K340
0.733 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
VS
GRID K340
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GK107
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
2
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
3
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla K10
4
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
5
NVIDIA L4 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
6
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
7
Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
8
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla P4
9
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI
10
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy